Article: PDF
DOI: 10.26170/2071-2405-2024-29-1-97-103
Abstract: This study carries out a pilot monitoring of the functional and stylistic potential of participles, i.e. it reveals the possibilities of their use in different stylistic contexts. The urgency of the study can be attributed to the interest of linguists in the specificity of the functioning of participles and to the fact that the peculiarities of their use today remain beyond the limits of linguistic research. The scientific novelty of the article stems from the study of the participle in a new aspect as a functional unit of speech. The main aim of this work is to identify the regularity of the distribution of participles in texts of different discourse types (artistic, scientific, journalistic, and colloquial). The article empirically proves the theoretical position about the connection between the frequency of functioning of participles in various stylistic contexts and their semantics and pragmatics. The logic of the study is based on the justification of the general hypothesis, which consists in the presence of different numbers of participles in the texts under consideration: after certain statistical data have been obtained, it is possible to endow them with functional (qualitative) characteristics. The authors argue that as a result of calculations of the average values of the “involvement” indices of the text, a specific hypothesis will be confirmed with varying degrees of reliability: the functional potential of participles increases as the discourse moves away from the colloquial one, in which such potential is minimal. The authors assume the following gradation of the functional style potential of participles: colloquial – fiction (prosaic) – journalistic – scientific with the potential growing from low to high. This assumption is based on observations made by the authors in previous studies, in which it was found that the frequency of participles of some functional styles is often in contrast with the frequency of others. The result of the analysis of the level of “participiality” of texts (we suggest using this term – from participium – participle – to denote the saturation of texts with participial forms) confirms the position that there is a stylistic constant in the texts of each functional variety. This partly suggests the possibility of its use for the description of a linguistic personality by the index of the frequency of the use of participles in a certain type of texts.
Key words: participle; functioning of participles in speech; functional variety of speech; quantitative morphology; frequency; index of text involvement; individual style

Для цитирования:

Питина, С. А. Универсальные характеристики и уникальные особенности челябинских «цветочных» эргонимов / С. А. Питина, Е. В. Харченко // Philological Class. – 2024. – Vol. 29 ⋅ №1. – С. 97–103. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2024-29-1-97-103.

For citation

Pitina, S. A., Kharchenko, E. V. (2024). Universal and Unique Characteristics of Chelyabinsk “Floral” Ergonyms. In Philological Class. 2024. Vol. 29 ⋅ №1. P. 97–103. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2024-29-1-97-103.

About the author(s) :

Nikolay D. Golev
Kemerovo State University (Kemerovo, Russia)
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-3007


Anastasia I. Radchenko

Russian State Institute of Performing Arts, branch in Kemerovo (Kemerovo, Russia)
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-7343

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 04.08.2023; date of publication: 31.03.2024

References:

Anosova, A. A. (2021). Funktsionirovanie prichastii v zagolovkakh novostnykh i analiticheskikh statei v russkom i angliiskom yazykakh [The Functioning of Participles in the Headlines of the News and Analytical Articles in the Russian and English Languages]. In Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. No. 1 (86), pp. 368–370. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.24412/1991-5497-2021-186-368-370.
Anosova, A. A. (2022). Funktsionirovanie prichastii russkogo yazyka v tekstakh publitsisticheskogo stilya [Functioning of the Russian Participles in Publicistic Texts]. In Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I. Ya. Yakovleva. No. 3 (116), pp. 3–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37972/chgpu.2022.116.3.001.
Biryukova, E. V. (2013). Prichastnye oboroty i ikh sinonimy v nemetskom yazyke s tochki zreniya stilistiki [Participle Constructions and Their Synonyms in German in Terms of Stylistics]. In Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 141–144.
Blokhina, N. V. (2006). Funktsionirovanie prostykh predlozhenii, oslozhnennykh prichastnymi i deeprichastnymi oborotami, v khudozhestvennom tekste [Functioning of Simple Sentences Complicated by Participial Constructions and Verbal Adverbial Constructions in Literary Text]. In Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. No. 2 (42), pp. 276–279.
Degtyareva, E. G. (2020). Pragmaticheskie faktory upotrebleniya passivnykh konstruktsii v tekstakh SMI (na primere materialov BBC) [Pragmatic Factors of Using Passive Constructions in Media Texts (With Focus on BBC News Reports)]. In Vorontsova, T. I. (Ed.). Gertsenovskie chteniya. Inostrannye yazyki: sb. nauch. tr. Saint Petersburg, RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, pp. 151–153.
Demyankov, V. Z. (2000). Funktsionalizm v zarubezhnoi lingvistike kontsa XX v. [Functionalism in Foreign Linguistics of the Late 20th Century]. In Diskurs, rech', rechevaya deyatel'nost': funktsional'nye i strukturnye aspekty: sbornik obzorov. Moscow, INION RAN, pp. 14–68.
Dorofeev, Yu. V., Zhuravleva, E. A. (2023). Funktsional'naya paradigma v rusistike: ot funktsionirovaniya edinits k regulyativnoi kontseptsii yazyka [Functional Paradigm in Russian Studies: From the Functioning of Units to the Regulatory Concept of Language]. In Rusistika. Vol. 21. No. 1, pp. 49–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-1-49-63.
Dunaev, A. E. (2019). Zhanrovo-stilisticheskie kharakteristiki atributov sushchestvitel'nogo v nemetskikh gorodskikh khronikakh XV–XVI vv. [Genre and Stylistic Characteristics of Noun Attributes in German Town Chronicles of the 15th and 16th Centuries]. In Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoriya, pedagogika, filologiya. Vol. 25. No. 4, pp. 149–155. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2019-25-4-149-155.
Glinkina, L. A. (2011). Chastotnost' kak znachimyi registr leksikografii i frazeografii [Frequency as an Important Characteristic of Lexicography and Phraseography]. In Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. No. 3 (33), pp. 7–11.
Golev, N. D. (2012). Ponyatie «kvantitativnaya moshchnost' yazykovykh edinits» i ego issledovatel'skie vozmozhnosti (po statisticheskim dannym poiskovykh sistem Interneta) [The Concept of “Quantitative Power of Linguistic Units” and Its Research Capabilities (According to Statistical Data of Internet Search Engines)]. In Lesnikov, S. V. (Ed.). Metayazyk nauki: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Syktyvkar, 10–13 iyunya 2012 g. Syktyvkar, SyktGU, pp. 245–254.
Golev, N. D. (2019). Diskursivnyi slovar' dialektnoi leksiki Noveishego vremeni (na materiale Runeta): innovatsionnyi leksikograficheskii proekt [A Modern Dialect Vocabulary Discourse Dictionary (Based on Runet Materials): An Innovative Lexicographic Project]. In Voprosy leksikografii. No. 16, pp. 113–137. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.17223/22274200/16/7.
Golub, I. B. (2010). Prichastie [Communion]. In Stilistika russkogo yazyka. 11th edition. Moscow, Airis-press, pp. 321–325.
Kachmazova, E. S. (2017). Sintaksis i stilistika osetinskikh prichastii [Syntax and Stylistics of Ossetian Participles]. In Sovremennyi uchenyi. No. 7, pp. 197–200.
Kitadze, M. (2011). K voprosu o kolebanii v upotreblenii vremennykh form russkikh deistvitel'nykh prichastii nesovershennogo vida [To the Issue of Use of Tense Forms of Past and Present Participles in Russian]. In Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M. A. Sholokhova. Filologicheskie nauki. No. 1, pp. 53–64.
Kol’tsova, L. M., Novikova, O. Yu. (2014). Graficheskaya reprezentatsiya prichastiya i prichastnogo oborota v khudozhestvennom tekste [Graphic Representation of Participles and Participle Phrases in a Literary Text]. In Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. No. 4, pp. 87–91.
Lavrishchev, A. I. (2008). Funktsional'noe napravlenie v lingvistike kak sredstvo realizatsii mezhpredmetnoi svyazi dvukh yazykov [Functional Direction in Linguistics as a Means of Implementing the Interdisciplinary Connection of Two Languages]. In Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. No. 1, pp. 240–247.
Lobovskaya, T. V. (2005). Funktsionirovanie prichastiya v angliiskom yazyke: na materiale angliiskoi i amerikanskoi prozy 20 veka [Functioning of the Participle in English: Based on the Material of English and American Prose of the 20th Century]. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Murmansk. 198 p.
Muratova, E. Yu. (2014). Spetsifika funktsionirovaniya prichastiya v poeticheskom tekste [Specificity of the Participle Functioning in Poetic Text]. In Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. No. 1, pp. 48–52.
Novikova, O. Yu. (2015). Osnovnye napravleniya v izuchenii prichastiya i prichastnogo oborota v sovremennoi lingvistike [The Main Directions in the Study of the Participle and Participial Phrase in Modern Linguistics]. In Savenkova, L. B., Kedrova, E. Ya. (Eds.). Yazyk kak sistema i deyatel'nost' – 5: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta i 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora Yu. A. Gvozdareva, Rostov-na-Donu, 25–27 sentyabrya 2015 g. Rostov-on-Don, YuFU, pp. 92–94.
Rarenko, M. B. (2005). 2005.04.027. Kosinets I. I. Stilisticheskie osobennosti eksplikatsii verbal'nykh znachenii russkikh prichastii v angliiskom yazyke. – Pyatigorsk, 2003. – 148 s. [2005.04.027. Kosinets I. I. Stylistic Features of Explication of Verbal Meanings of Russian Participles in English. – Pyatigorsk, 2003. – 148 p.]. In Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 6: Yazykoznanie. No. 4, pp. 163–166.
Rezunova, M. V. (2004). Perekhodimost' i sinkretizm prichastii v leksikograficheskom i khudozhestvennom diskurse v russkom, angliiskom i nemetskom yazykakh [Transitivity and Syncretism of Participles in Lexicographic and Artistic Discourse in Russian, English and German]. Dis. … kand. filil. nauk. Bryansk. 187 p.
Rozental, D. E. (2003). Prakticheskaya stilistika russkogo yazyka [Practical Stylistics of the Russian Language]. Moscow, AST-LTD. 401 p.
Ryzhakova, A. D., Zhukova O. R. (2022). Ispol'zovanie prichastii i prichastnykh oborotov v literature XIX–XXI vv. [The Use of Participles and Participial Phrases in the Literature of the 19th–21st Centuries]. In Molodezhnyi vestnik IrGTU. Vol. 12. No. 3, pp. 574–577.
Shmelev, D. N. (1977). Russkii yazyk v ego funktsional'nykh raznovidnostyakh [Russian Language in Its Functional Varieties]. Moscow.
Skvortsova, N. N. (2015). O modal'noi semantike deistvitel'nykh i stradatel'nykh prichastii [On the Modal Semantics of Real and Passive Participles]. In Chernov, S. S. (Ed.). Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi nauki : sb. nauch. tr. Issue 40. Novosibirsk, TsRNS, pp. 155–176.
Sosnovtseva, E. G. (2016). «Byvaet + stradatel'noe prichastie»: semantika konstruktsii i ee upotreblenie v pamyatnikakh russkoi agiografii [The Grammatical Analysis of Constructions Byvaet with Passive Participles in Russian Angiography]. In Trudy instituta russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova. No. 10, pp. 516–526.
Torotoev, G. G. (2006). Funktsional'no-stilisticheskaya differentsiatsiya opredelenii v sovremennom yakutskom yazyke [Functional and Stylistic Differentiation of Definitions in the Modern Yakut Language]. Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Yakutsk. 26 p.
Torotoev, G. G. (2007). Stilistika opredelitel'nykh konstruktsii v ofitsial'no-delovom stile sovremennogo yakutskogo yazyka [Modern Yakut: Stylistics of Attributive Constructions in Formal-Business Style]. In Vestnik Yakutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vol. 4. No. 4, pp. 59–62.
Uglanova, I. A. (2009). Ob «effekte chastoty» v tipologicheskikh issledovaniyakh i teorii yazykovykh universalii [On the “Frequency Effect” in Typological Research and the Theory of Linguistic Universal]. In Filologicheskie zametki. Vol. 7. No. 1. URL: https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/philologicalstudies/article/view/649 (mode of access: 14.04.2023).
Volynets, T. N. (1998). Grammaticheskii fenomen prichastiya [The Grammatical Phenomenon of the Participle]. Minsk, BGU. 138 p.
Zagorodnyuk, A. A. (2021). Deistvitel'nye prichastiya v russkoi ustno-razgovornoi rechi [Active Participles in Spoken Russian]. In Mir russkogo slova. No. 1, pp. 23–29. DOI: http://doi.org/10.24411/1811-1629-2021-1-23-29.
Zinina, Yu. M. (2021). Prichastie v sostavnom imennom skazuemom [Participle in a Compound Nominal Predicate]. In Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. No. 4, pp. 48–56. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2021.4.35359.
Zubova, L. V. (2015). Neuzual'nye stradatel'nye prichastiya nastoyashchego vremeni v sovremennoi poezii [The Irregular Present Passive Participles in Modern Russian Poetry]. In Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii. Vol. 11. No. 1, pp. 63–82.