Journal archive

Abstract: The article deals with the current state of the national precedent base, which has been founded on the classical Russian literature for many years. The study employs the methods of comparative extrapolation, referring to the phenomenon of “contested territories” (the concept was introduced by Ian Rotherham) discovered during the interdisciplinary study of the science track of the topic “Materialized identity: Construction of memory in socio-economic perspective (on the example of the archaeological site Arkaim)”. The article uses the concept of “contested territory” with reference to the current state of fiction and the entry points into its space through school education. The author traces the main challenges of the modern reading culture: the range of readers’ interests covers completely different segments of the “contested territory” of literature than the usual “lists of required literature” or “lists for extracurricular reading”; navigation in the world of literature is carried out not by recommendations of teachers or librarians, but by following influencers; in the institute of literary education itself, the school subject “literature” has been marginalized due to the lack of a mandatory universal exam. The result is the departure of the classical set of quotations, information about the lives and significance of writers, even their names and titles of works from the precedent base of new generations, which has actually led to its fall. Extrapolation of the results of the analysis of the management of the territory of the memorial landscape allows the researcher to see the same problems in the management of the classical heritage in the field of literature. The rejection of the “forced indoctrination” of the classics gives rise to a number of painful consequences, among which the author notes the following: the displacement of classical literature, even in its most famous versions, from the space of remake practices, including jokes, puns, memes and other forms; the emergence of gaps in intergenerational communication; the threat of socio-cultural gaps in the processes of building national identity: the creation of conditions for filling the gaps with fragmentary generators of situational meanings that have lost their evaluative content. The discovery of the fact of the collapse of the national precedent base in terms of the presence of references to the Russian classical literature is important for the implementation of social management and requires certain institutional decisions in the field of general indoctrination of classical works of literature.

About the author(s) :

Marina V. Zagidullina

Chelyabinsk State University (Chelyabinsk, Russia)

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4799-1230

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 14.11.2024; date of publication: 28.12.2024

References:

Asonova, E. A., Borusyak, L. F., Kikteva, K. S., Romanicheva, E. S. (2020). Infrastruktura chteniya s pozitsii sub"ekta

[Reading Infrastructure from the Perspective of the Subject]. Moscow, Moskovskii gorodskoi pedagogicheskii universitet. 216 p.

Asonova, E. A., Borusyak, L. F., Romanicheva, E. S. (2020). Literaturnoe obrazovanie: mneniya uchastnikov

obrazovatel'nykh otnoshenii [Literary Education: Opinions of Educational Relationship Participants]. In Voprosy obrazovaniya. No. 1, pp. 159–181.

Dorozhkin, A. M. (2017). Problemy postroeniya i tipologii zon obmena [Problems of Construction and Typology

of Exchange Zones]. In Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Vol. 54. No. 4, pp. 20–29. DOI: 10.5840/eps201754462.

Galison, P. L. (1997). Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press.

Galison, P. L. (2010). Trading with the Enemy. In Gorman, M. (Ed.). Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating

New Kinds of Collaboration. Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 25–52.

Kiselev, D. G. (2023). Kommunikativnye kul'turnye praktiki osvoeniya memorativnykh landshaftov (na primere

Arkaima) [Communicative Cultural Practices of Grasping Memorial Landscapes (in the Example of Arkaim)]. In Znak:

problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniya. No. 4 (50), pp. 85–88. DOI: 10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-85-88.

Kupriyanova, E. V. (2021). Arkaim: rozhdenie legendy [Arkaim: The Birth of a Legend]. Chelyabinsk, Krai Ra.

Maslanov, E. V. (2023). Zony obmena i pogranichnye ob"ekty: k tipologii [Zones of Exchange and Borderline Objects: Towards a Typology]. In Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya. Vol. 39. Issue 1,

pp. 159–170. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2023.113.

Pavlovets, M., Remorenko, I. (2014). Ob izmenenii reglamentatsii prepodavaniya literatury v sovremennoi shkole

[On the Changes in the Regulation of Literature Teaching in Modern School]. In Voprosy obrazovaniya. No. 4, pp. 209–

226. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2014-4-209-226.

Pobedinskaya, D. A., Gorokhova, N. E. (2022). Booktuber Channel as a Modern Type of Literary Reviews. In Kirillova, V. V. (Ed.). Dialogue of cultures: materialy XV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii na angliiskom

yazyke: v 3-kh chastyakh, Sankt-Peterburg, 17–19 maya 2022 goda. Part 1. Saint Petersburg,Vysshaya shkola tekhnologii i

energetiki Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta promyshlennykh tekhnologii i dizaina, pp. 125–129.

Rastorgueva, V. S. (2023). Literaturnyi internet-mem kak sotsiokul'turnyi fenomen v sovremennoi mediasrede

[Literary Internet Meme as a Sociocultural Phenomenon in the Modern Media Environment]. In Kazanskaya nauka.

No. 12, pp. 475–480.

Rotherham, I. D. (2019). Issues and Approaches in Managing Visitors to Pagan Sacred Sites. In Griffiths, M.,

Wiltshier, P. (Eds.). Managing Religious Tourism. CABI, pp. 92–102.

Rubakin, N. A. (1905). Russkie chitateli i ikh obstanovka [Russian Readers and Their Environment]. In Vestnik

znaniya. No. 1, pp. 172–182.

Safonov, A. V., Topchy, I. V. (2023). Sistema obrazov memorativnogo landshafta arkheologicheskogo pamyatnika Arkaim kak faktor ego populyarizatsii [The System of Images of the Memorial Landscape of the Archaeological Monument of Arkaim as a Factor in Its Popularization]. In Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniya. No. 4 (50),

pp. 102–111. DOI: 10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-102-111.

Shevchenko, K. A., Chernenko, O. G. (2022). Fenomen BookTube i ego vozmozhnosti v prodvizhenii knigi

[The Phenomenon of BookTube and Its Opportunities in Promoting Books]. In Biblioteka v XXI veke. Sotsial'naya missiya:

materialy XIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov, Minsk, 24–25 marta

2022 goda. Minsk, OOO «Kovcheg», pp. 323–327.

Shishmarenkova, G. Ya. (1994). Izuchenie povesti N. V. Gogolya «Maiskaya noch', ili Utoplennitsa» (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) [Study of the Story by N. V. Gogol "May Night, or The Drowned Woman" (Methodological Recommendations)]. In Volodina, I. V. (Ed.). Po novym programmam. 5 klass: sbornik statei v pomoshch' uchitelyu literatury.

Cherepovets, Izdatel'stvo ChGPI im. A. V. Lunacharskogo, pp. 4–10.

Simakova, S. I. (2023). Arkaim kak element simvolicheskogo kapitala Chelyabinskoi oblasti [Arkaim as an Element of the Symbolic Capital of the Chelyabinsk Region]. In Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniya. No. 4 (50), pp. 112–118. DOI: 10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-112-118.

Sokovikov, S. S., Kaminskaya, E. A. (2023). Spontannaya ierotopiya v sovremennom mifotvorchestve: sluchai

Arkaima [Spontaneous Ierotopia in Contemporary Mythomaking: The Case of Arkaim]. In Observatoriya kul'tury.

Vol. 20. No. 6, pp. 658–668. DOI: 10.25281/2072-3156-2023-20-6-658-668.

Sumskaya, A. S., Sverdlov, S. A. (2019). «Analogovoe» i «tsifrovoe» pokolenie auditorii SMI: rol' kommunikativnokul'turnoi pamyati v transformatsii mediapraktik [‘Analog’ and ‘Digital’ Generations of Media Audiences: The Role of Communicative Cultural Memory in the Transformation of Media Practices]. In Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta.

Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. Vol. 25. No. 3 (189), pp. 32–48.

Vdovin, A. V. (2023). Ot «Polnoi russkoi khrestomatii» k pervoi programme po literature: stanovlenie standartov

literaturnogo obrazovaniya v Rossii [From “The Complete Russian Reader” to the First Literature Curriculum: The

Formation of Literary Education Standards in Russia]. In Vdovin, A. V., Zubkov, K. Yu. (Eds.). Instituty literatury v Rossiiskoi imperii: kollekt. monogr. Moscow, Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, pp. 315–348.

Vdovin, A. V., Leibov, R. G. (2013). Khrestomatiinye teksty: russkaya poeziya i shkol'naya praktika XIX veka

[Reader Texts: Russian Poetry and School Practices of the 19th Century]. In Vdovin, A. V., Leibov, R. G. (Eds.). Acta

Slavica Estonica IV. Trudy po russkoi i slavyanskoi filologii. Literaturovedenie IX. Vol. 4: Khrestomatiinye teksty: russkaya pedagogicheskaya praktika i literaturnyi kanon XIX v. Tartu, Izdatel'stvo Tartuskogo universiteta, pp. 7–34.

Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. In Public

Understanding of Science. No. 9 (3), pp. 281–304.

Zagidullina, M. V. (2016). Podrostki: chtenie i Internet v povsednevnoi zhizni [Teenagers: Reading and the Internet in Daily Life]. In Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. No. 5 (385), pp. 115–123.

Zdanovich, D. G. et al. (1999). Arkaim: drevnost', modern, postmodern [Arkaim: Antiquity, Modernity, Postmodernity]. In Arkaim: 1987–1997: bibliogr. ukaz. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, pp. 8–46.

Zinin, S. A., Barabanova, M. A., Novikova, L. V. (2023). Analiticheskii otchet o rezul'tatakh EGE 2023 goda po literature [Analytical Report on the Results of the 2023 Unified State Exam in Literature]. In Pedagogicheskie izmereniya.

No. 4, pp. 3–31.

Zubanova, L. B. (2023). Ezotericheskii i mediinyi shleif memorial'nogo landshafta: teoreticheskie aspekty i

arkhitekturnye kontury polevogo issledovaniya [The Esoteric and Media Trail of the Memorial Landscape: Theoretical

Aspects and Architectural Contours of Field Research]. In Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovaniya. No. 4 (50), pp. 79–84. DOI: 10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-79-84.